Ethical Challenges in the Era If Health Care Reform

Ethics, Law, and polity Vicki D. Lachman Ethical Ch all(prenominal)enges in the Era Of wellness C be Reform n truth, the united States is at the beginning of a long overdue and a much needed wellness precaution revitalize. We lay down seen the dismal statistics astir(predicate) our high woo wellness c atomic number 18 system and some of the slight than stellar outcomes (e. g. , infant mortality) (Callahan, 2011 public wellness Organization WHO, 2011)). The purpose of this term is not to complain active the current wellness c be system, however instead to focus on existing reform efforts The Patient auspices and he low-cost Care work on (ACA), the ethical merelyifications for its creation, and ethical challenges it brings. I Key Features of the Law ACA offers new ways for consumers and providers to hold redress companies accountable. The intimately pregnant parts of the legality are features described in the interest discussion. Because of space limitation, I leave alone highlight some elements of the law that are enacted with 2014 and clearly impact nursing. These selected features include damages excerptions, damages costs, proficients and protection, and mass age 65 and older. redress policy ChoicesThe intention of the law is to expand health dole out reporting to most U. S. citizens and permanent residents by requiring most battalion to have or purchase health insurance (HealthCare. gov, 2012a). Citizens go away have a choice of private insurance, employer-paid insurance, Medicaid, Medi sympathize with, or state- ground insurance ex castrates. Affordable amends Exchanges. Individuals and small businesses can purchase coverage through with(predicate) these exchanges, with premium and cost-sharing ascribe available to privates and families with income between 133%-400% of the federal poverty guideline (in 2011, the overty guideline was $18,530 for a family of three) (Werhane & Tieman, 2011). Businesses with 50 or mo re employees need to make coverage available, and businesses with little than 25 employees result qualify for tax credits to offset their cost (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2011). Consumer Ope orderd and oriented Plan (CO-OP). The ACA produces a new kind of non-profit health insurer, called a Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP). CO-OPs are meant to offer consumer-friendly, affordable health insurance options to individuals and small businesses. By January 1, 2014, individuals will be able to buy a CO-OPVicki D. Lachman, PhD, APRN, MBE, FAAN, is Clinical Professor, and Director, Innovation and Intra/Entrepreneurship in Advanced Practice Nursing, Drexel University, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Philadelphia, PA. 248 health plan through the Affordable Insurance Exchanges. Pre-existing mark off insurance plan. All covered benefits are available to individuals, even to hide a exist condition. This program offers temporary protection for people with pre-existing co nditions until 2014, when insurance companies can no longer deny individuals coverage based on their health status.Young adult coverage. Individuals can add or hold back their children on their health insurance policy until they reach age 26. The law makes it easier and more affordable for young adults to get health insurance coverage. Insurance Costs ACA holds insurance companies accountable. It alike helps individuals keep their costs down. Value for individuals premium sawbuck. ACA requires insurers selling policies to individuals or small groups to spend at least 80% of premiums on direct medical apprehension and efforts to ameliorate the prime(a) of oversee. Unfortunately, this does not apply to self-insured plans.Lifetime and annual limits. ACA restricts and phases out the annual dollar limits a health plan can place on most of its benefits. Furthermore, ACA eliminates these limits completely in 2014. Rate review. Insurance companies must now liberate proposed rate in creases for health insurance. Insurance companies cannot raise rates by 10% or more without first explaining the reasons to the state or federal rate review program. Rights and Protections The ACA puts consumers in charge of their health finagle, not insurance companies. The sideline rights and consumer protections are available. Preventive care.Individuals may not have to gestate a co even upment, co-insurance, or deductible to receive recommended hobble health services, such as screenings (e. g. , mammograms and colonoscopies), vaccinations (e. g. measles, polio, or meningitis), and counseling (e. g. , smoking cessation, weight loss, healthy eating). Doctor choice and ER access. Individuals can spot any available participating firsthand care provider and they can access out-of-network emergency rooms without anterior approval. ACA prohibits health plans from requiring a referral from a primary care provider earlier women can seek coverage for obstetrical or ynecological (O BGYN) care. plenty 65 and older. ACA offers eligible elders a range of preventive services with no cost-sharing. ACA also provides discounts on drugs when older adults are in the coverage gap cognise as the donut hole. July-August 2012 Vol. 21/No. 4 Ethical Challenges in the Era of Health Care Reform TABLE 1. Views of heavy(p) Egalitarians vs. Libertarians and Free-Market Advocates Liberal Egalitarians Libertarians and Free-Market Advocates Health care is a fundamental rock-steady and access to this faithful Role of government is confined to protecting the freedom of all allows us to become full members of family. ersons to choose their own goals and means to pursue them. This right to health care must be exercised by removing all People have a right to non-interference. barriers to access. Justice, equality, and community are values. Freedom and ad hominem duty are values. Health care is a right. Health care is a commodity. Single-payer system is the solution. De fundament alized market mechanisms with individual(prenominal) payment are the solution. Preventive services. The list is significant and begins with an annual wellness visit. Other important preventive services include b unity mass measurement cervical cancer creening, including Pap smear tests and pelvic exams colorectal, prostate, and diabetes screening influenza, pneumonia, and hepatitis B immunizations and many other services. There are other services and features in the ACA that could be discussed, entirely we will now move to discuss the ethical justifications for the ACA. The disputation it has created in the eyes of individuals with a free-market or libertarian view will be compared to those with a liberalegalitarian outlook. Ethical Justifications for the ACA Since 1986, the Emergency Treatment and Labor Act has banned hospitals from refusing acute care to any ndividual who could not afford to pay (CMS. gov, 2012). Consequently, $ nose candy billion of care annually is costshifte d onto patients who can pay, almost all whom are insured. This shift raises the average annual health insurance premium roughly $1,000 for every insured family (Crowley, 2009, p. 10). This neglect of permeative justice for the insured is one reason why insurance is being canond in ACA. It is equally raw to say-so that all citizens have insurance if insurance is not affordable, as this could cause significant harm to individuals and families already struggling financially.Therefore, the ethical principles of munificence and nonmaleficence are condescended by the features of Affordable Insurance Exchanges and the development of Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans. Ethical reasoning for health care reform has relied primarily on distri justive justice as justification for change, specifically due to lack of access to care for the underinsured and uninsured (Lachman, 2009). According to the U. S. Census Bureau, 46. 3 meg people in the United States were uninsured in 2008 (ProC on. org, 2012). The United States is the exclusively developed nation in the world hat does not control health coverage. Table 1 offers a comparison of views of persons who support distributive justice, see health care as a right, and therefore urgency a single-payer system with those individuals who want to continue the free-market system. To single-payer advocates, the primary goal of health policy is ensuring that everyone can obtain some minimal level July-August 2012 Vol. 21/No. 4 of health care (Sade, 2007, p. 1429). Making access to health care widely available permits individuals to be fully functioning members of society and the moral ommunity (a group of people drawn together by a common interest in living according to a occurrence moral philosophy). On the other hand, Americans who are libertarians and free-market advocates mostly look beyond the natural (genetic) and social (upbringing) lottery that places some at a impairment and instead look to the individuals f ree will and in the flesh(predicate) responsibility for actions (Callahan, 2011 Pariser, 2012 Trotter, 2011). They believe health care is one of the many options from which to choose to improve their lot in life. Their belief in personal responsibility can make them unsympathetic o people with unhealthy lifestyles for whom they would finally have to spend their insurance dollars. They also resent having to fund treatments they in person would not choose (e. g. , transplants, mechanical ventilation for person in unrelenting vegetative state). Though many wealthy individuals support health care reform out of benevolence, they do fear the loss of freedom which is central to their value system. However, two additional factors drive change for health care reform significant cost and quality troubles. In 2007, health care expenditures totaled $2. 2 trillion, 16. 2% of the U.S. economy. Health care employs more than 14 million people and is the largest industry in the United States. O f the 193 WHO member states, the United States is ranked first in per capita health care expenditures ($6,719) (ProCon. org, 2012). The present health care system is not giving the utility for the dollars spent. This cost problem is a reason that ACA has a focus on physicians counseling individuals on end-of-life options. It found that about 30 percent of Medicare dollars are spent during the furthermost year of life, and half of that is spent during the last 60 days. In 2009 dollars, Dr.Gordon calculated, that amounts to $70 billion a year, much of it spent on futile care that prolongs suffering (Brody, 2009, para 20). Unfortunately, politics initially got in the way in 2009 with the death panel jargon and this counseling was dropped from ACA however, this end-of-life options counseling was incorporated into 2011 Medicare reimbursement for health care providers (HealthCare. gov, 2012b). 249 Ethics, Law, and Policy WHO (2011) statistics also indicate the money spent is not putting us at the top of the list in quality outcomes. The infant mortality rate for the United States in 2009 was even deaths per 1,000 alive(p) births, ranking the United States 43rd among WHO nations. Rates for Sweden, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Iceland are all half of the United States rate. Quality is a focus of ACA in the preventive realm and with quality measurement. Two essential principles of the ACA are that 1. Provider reimbursement for health services is based, in part, on the relative quality and patient vex of the care provided. 2. Information about that comparative quality and patient accept will be publicly accessible. Quality and patient satisfaction will be rewarded by ata from hospital comparison required by the hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems for Medicare patients. The implications of Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) regulations for hospitals are clear FY2013 implementation at 1% of base DRG payments, ris ing to 2% by FY2017 (Acton, 2012, para 2). Hospitals will have to earn it back by achieving and abide bying high quality and confident(p) patient causes. This consequential focus in the patient care experience supports the autonomous choice of the patient for hospitals and physicians. Ethical Challenges of ACA Legal ChallengeBefore discussing three cay ethical challenges health care providers will face, the legal challenge beforehand the arrogant Court needs to be addressed. This challenge determined if the ACA want to purchase health insurance violates Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U. S. Constitution Congress shall have the Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and the general Welfare of the United States but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States (Werhane & Tieman, 2011, p. 83)The argument against this mandate is that the government has never required p eople to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States. However, every working person is required to pay into Social Security and Medicare. The counter argument is that these are government-mandated and governmentrun programs. This argument in the long run could support a Supreme Court decision of only a government-run singlepayer system, an action libertarians and free-market advocates oppose. Second, there are requirements for car insurance for drivers, and flood insurance for persons ho live within authorized distance from a viable flood plain. Because all people will need health care at some point in their lives, the argument could be make that insurance should be a requirement so as not to burden the moral community with the costs of those who do pay for insurance (Hamel & Nairn, 2011). 250 On June 28, 2012, the U. S. Supreme Court endorsed most of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, including the contentious individual mandate t hat requires most Americans to obtain health insurance. In a 5-4 decision, the court said the federal government has he power to fine Americans who do not acquire insurance because it is considered a tax (Jaslow, 2012). Electronic Medical Records The requirement for electronic records could generate a significant ethical challenge for privacy and confidentiality. Unfortunately, the $20 billion for health information technology from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) did little to change the current HIPPA privacy paradigm (Crowley, 2009). Furthermore, it is likely patients will carry their personal health records in their own electronic devices or retrieve them through the Internet.A transformation in rural health care is likely through telehealth and telehomecare. These innovations will bring expertise to patients to facilitate the best choice in their treatment decisions. The challenge will be to assure informed swallow and confidentiality in this expanded digital a ge. Chronic Disease Management Individuals with chronic illness benefit significantly from palliative care services, not just at end-of-life care but throughout the disease progression. The ACA focus on chronic disease management is best exemplified by this phrase An integrated care approach to managing illness hich includes screenings, check-ups, monitoring and coordinating treatment, and patient teaching (HealthCare. gov, 2012b, para 1). Feministic ethics, with its focus on managing the particulars of any persons situation, celebrates this modify service to individuals who must manage illnesses often for many years. In her book, care A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, Nell Noddings (2003) argued that a godliness based on rules is inadequate. She contended this approach loses the richness of the moral dilemmas people face, and nly situational and contextual knowledge of the individual can help resolve the moral quandaries of life. organization Health Care Pol icy According to the Code of Ethics for Nurses, provision 9 (American Nurses Association ANA, 2001), nurses have an obligation to work individually as citizens or collectively through political action to bring about social change (p. 25). This responsibility to shape social (health care) policy calls for nurses to juncture concerns about the meaning of the rejection of the individual mandate for society. The libertarians and free-market advocates reinforce a exaggeration of American individualism and weaken a sense of responsibility for oneself and pest citizensIt neglects one side of the equation, forgetting that we are not only individuals with the freedom to choose, but also members of society called to uphold a common good. (Hamel & Nairn, 2011, p. 94) continued on varlet 245 July-August 2012 Vol. 21/No. 4 Ethics, Law, and Policy REFERENCES continued from page 250 Therefore, nurses and nursing associations have the ethical challenge to stand firm for patients and ensure the long-term sustainability of our health care system.Nurses need to advocate for the people without a voice those discriminated against because of health status and lack of insurance. Conclusion ACA has provided a assemblage for debate about not only health care insurance, mechanisms to maintain financial stability of its systems, and strategies to ensure access to millions of people, but also has contributed to define American societys values. It is easy to argue against the individual mandate impingement on choice and freedom. However, other provisions provide children, adults, and elders with coverage and services that will help keep hem healthy and support them in their management of chronic diseases, while quelling the fear of bankruptcy. The Supreme Court will decide the legal matters in ACA, but it will not resolve the ethical matters. Can Americans continue to allow the self-protective practices of insurance companies in excluding high- pretend individuals (e. g. , pre-exi sting conditions, lifetime caps on benefits)? The principle of impropriety was never meant to abandon the moral relationships that continue to be necessary for the humans good. The nurse respects the worth, dignity and rights of all human eings irrespective of the temper of the health problem (ANA, 2001, p. 7). July-August 2012 Vol. 21/No. 4 Acton, A. (2012). The hidden risk (or reward) of HCAHPS. Retrieved from http//blog. healthstream. com/blog/bid/103384/The-Hidden-Risk-orReward-of-HCAHPS American Nurses Association (ANA). (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretative statements. Silver Spring, MD Author. Brody, J. E. (2009). End-of-life issues need to be addressed. Retrieved from http//www. nytimes. com/2009/08/18/health/18brod. hypertext markup language Callahan, D. (2011). Health care reform Can a communitarian perspective be salvaged?Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 32(5), 351-362. CMS. gov. (2012). Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA). Retrieved f rom http//www. cms. gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/ Legislation/EMTALA/index. html? redirect=/EMTALA/ Crowley, M. (2009). Connecting American values with health care reform. Garrison, NY The Hastings Center. Hamel, R. , & Nairn, T. (2011). The individual mandate A rancorous moral matter. Health Progress, 92(4), 88-95. HealthCare. gov. (2012a). Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from http//www. healthcare. gov/law/full/ HealthCare. gov. (2012b). Chronic disease management.Retrieved from http//www. healthcare. gov/ glossiness/c/chronic. html Jaslow, R. (2012). Medical groups laud Supreme Courts decision on Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from http//www. cbsnews. com/8301504763_162-57462837-10391704/medical-groups-laud-supremecourts-decision-on-affordable-care-act/ Kaiser Family Foundation. (2011). Summary of new health reform law. Retrieved from www. kff. org/healthreform/8061. cfm Lachman, V. D. (2009). Ethical challenges in healthcare Developing your moral compass. current York, NY Spring er. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring A feminine approach to ethics and moral education.Berkeley, CA University of California Press. Pariser, D. M. (2012). Ethical considerations in health care reform Pros and cons of the affordable care act. Clinics in Dermatology, 30(2), 151-155. ProCon. org. (2012). Right to healthcare Did you know? Retrieved from http//healthcare. procon. org/ Sade, R. M. (2007). Ethical foundations of health care system reform. Annuals of Thoracic Surgery, 84(5), 1429-1431. Trotter, G. (2011). The moral basis for healthcare reform in the United States. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 20(1), 102-107. Werhane, P. , & Tieman, J. 2011). Clearing the brush Myths abut the Affordable Care Act. Health Progress, 92(4), 82-84, 86-87. World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). World health statistics 2011. Retrieved from http//www. who. int/whosis/indicators/WHS2011_ IndicatorCompendium_20110530. pdf 245 Copyright of MEDSURG Nursing is the property of Jannetti Publicat ions, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holders express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.